Thomas Grill wrote: > Hi, > sounds very reasonable to me. > The only potential problem that i see is the flat hierarchy (resp. > naming scheme) of the branches and tags. It seems that this folder > would populate quite fast and might quickly become a mess. On the
true. a better idea would probably be that each package gets its folder where releases can be put into, e.g.: /tags/zexy/zexy-2.1/ the reason for the flat hierarchy was, that deep hirarchies often tend to confuse more than not, at least if several unorganized people are involved (like we are): while more scrolling is involved in the flat hierarchy (seemingly more of a mess), inhierarchical structures it might eventually turn out that we have /tags/foo-1.0 but /tags/externals/bar/bar-2.0, which makes bar-2.0 much harder to find in relation to foo-1.0 > other hand it's quite easy to clean it up again with svn ;-) right; even if we do it like A, we can revise the directory structure to B later on :-) > Btw., where would the svn repository be located? i think there are currently no real objections against staying at sourceforge (at least, i had planned to put it there; just for the sake of all the developers already having an account there (and knowing their passwords)) fmas.dr IOhannes _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
