Hallo, IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > about the structure: > > i have written down some ideas on how an svn-repository could be > structured at http://puredata.info/Members/zmoelnig/pdcon07/SubVersion > > basically the layout keeps the same, but with svn-specifics like > meta-directories "trunk", "tags" and "branches". > ideally (for me) the layout of "trunk" would be: > /trunk/pd/ > /trunk/pd-devel/ > /trunk/desiredata/ > /trunk/externals/ > /trunk/packages/ > /trunk/scripts/ > /trunk/doc/
Another possibility that is seen sometimes in svn-repositories would be this: /pd/trunk/ /pd/tags/ /pd/branches/ ... /doc/trunk/ /doc/tags/ /doc/branches/ I just want to mention this, I didn't contemplate dis/advantages of this one vs. your suggestion at all so far. > differences to the current layout are: > - moved abstractions&extensions&xgui&Framestein into externals Good, KISS. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__ _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
