Hallo, Mathieu Bouchard hat gesagt: // Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > If Thomas hasn't changed his mind, pd-devel is going to be obsolete soon. > The latest changes still have to be picked up from there and moved > somewhere else, such as sf.net patchtracker and the desiredata branch, but > for all practical purposes, there will be no such branch. Let me also say > that pd-devel very much deserves to be a branch (rather than a plain > folder) because it has rather high mergeability with Miller's branch.
Branches (and tags) in Subversion *are* plain folders: "Creating a branch is very simple - you make a copy of the project in the repository using the svn copy command." See chapter 4 of the subversion book: http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.4/svn.branchmerge.using.html subsection "Creating a branch" and the rest of that chapter as well. > "scripts" is a vague name I'd get rid of. Or make it even more vague and call it "misc", so gripd would feel at home there as well. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__ _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
