I was thinking to a way for the transition: we could:
- change the t_pdinstance pd_s_* fields to pointers (and adapt the s_* replacement  macros accordingly),
- export "hidden" globals s_*
- initialize pd_maininstance pd_s_* fields to the global versions.
Yes, this would work. Of course, it would be an ABI break for multi-instance libpd, but I think it would be justified. I guess libpd users rarely rely on pre-build externals, and even if they do, I think it's ok to ask them to recompile.

We should probably also put the global s_* symbols in a deprecation macro that tells external authors to use gensym() instead.

Christof

On 04.04.2022 13:55, Antoine Rousseau wrote:
I very much agree that in the future Pd (and externals) could be always compiled with PDINSTANCE.

I was thinking to a way for the transition: we could:
- change the t_pdinstance pd_s_* fields to pointers (and adapt the s_* replacement  macros accordingly),
- export "hidden" globals s_*
- initialize pd_maininstance pd_s_* fields to the global versions.

CURRENT:
/* m_pd.h */
struct _pdinstance
{
    t_symbol pd_s_float;
}
#define s_float (pd_this->pd_s_float)

/* m_class.c */
t_pdinstance *pdinstance_init(t_pdinstance *x)
{
    dogensym("float",   &x->pd_s_float,    x);
}

PROPOSAL:
/* m_pd.h */
struct _pdinstance
{
    t_symbol  *pd_s_float;
}
#define s_float (*(pd_this->pd_s_float))

/* m_class.c */
#undef s_float
t_symbol s_float;
t_pdinstance *pdinstance_init(t_pdinstance *x)
{
    if(x != &pd_maininstance) x->pd_s_float = gensym("float");
    else {
dogensym("float",     &s_float,    x);
x->pd_s_float = &s_float;
}

What do you think?

I've tried this (in libpd context) almost successfully, but I've encountered a problem: the s_float as seen from an app linked to libpd seems to be uninitialized.
I've tried something simpler:
/* m_class.c */
float myfloat = 10.0;
t_pdinstance *pdinstance_init(t_pdinstance *x)
{
myfloat = 20.0;
printf("pdinstance_init::myfloat: %f\n", myfloat);
}

/* pdtest.c */
extern float myfloat;
int main()
{
    libpd_init();
    printf("myfloat: %f\n", myfloat);
}

cc -I../../../libpd_wrapper -I../../../pure-data/src -O3   -c -o pdtest.o pdtest.c
gcc -o pdtest pdtest.o ../../../libs/libpd.so

$ pdtest
pdinstance_init::myfloat: 20.00000
myfloat: 10.00000

Do you know why pdtest doesn't see the updated value?

Le mer. 30 mars 2022 à 23:51, Christof Ressi <i...@christofressi.com> a écrit :

    AFAICT, the main issue is that multi-instance Pd misses symbols for
    certain global variables, most notably  s_float, s_symbol, s_bang,
    etc.

    The problem is that these are really exported global structs. If they
    were *pointers*, we could simply make them point to the corresponding
    field in the main Pd instance. But in this case I don't really see a
    solution...

    On 30.03.2022 18:07, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
    >
    > On 3/30/22 17:45, Dan Wilcox wrote:
    >> I lean much more on the side that PDINSTANCE is a low-level, per
    >> project compile option and not general-purpose. If you are using
    >> libpd, then your environment is a bit more custom anyway.
    >
    > i wonder what the penalty would be to turn on PDINSTANCE on Pd?
    >
    >
    > obviously a problem with externals, but maybe we can come up
    with some
    > clever hack (under the assumption, that Pd (the app) only runs a
    > single instance, even if compiled with multi-instance support)
    to use
    > legacy externals - if that is even possible.
    >
    > apart from that?
    >
    > fgadrms
    > IOhannes
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Pd-dev mailing list
    > Pd-dev@lists.iem.at
    > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev



    _______________________________________________
    Pd-dev mailing list
    Pd-dev@lists.iem.at
    https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev


_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@lists.iem.at
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@lists.iem.at
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev

Reply via email to