Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 15:01 +0000, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
When writing it I found a bug in wrap~ in pd-0.40-2 from Miller's site:
sig~ 1
wrap~
print~
-> 0
as i would expect.
sig~ 0
wrap~
print~
-> 1
as i would expect, as well. where is the bug? am i missing something?
wrap~-help says:
----8<----
wrap~ gives the difference between the input and the
largest integer not exceeding it (for positive numbers this
is the fractional part).
----8<----
largest integer not exceeding 0 is 0, or?
largest integer not exceeding X is X when X is an integer, or?
it makes life simpler when
(x - (wrap~ x)) == x
when x is an integer, as there is no [int~] in Pd.
roman
Claude
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
