Hahaha : ). It was generating odd messages here, like [test $-7614554]. But I'm on an intel mac using Pd-Extended autobuilds, so that's probably normal.
Yes, I think a character escaping mechanism would be a good thing, though of course escaping is already used in the pd-fileformat so who knows what madness it would require. Thanks again! On 2/8/07, Chris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:16:02AM -0700, Luke Iannini (pd) wrote: > Hm... I'm not sure if your patch was supposed to "work" or demonstrate > my issue, Chris... thanks for making it regardless : ). It was supposed to solve your problem. > Thanks to both of yas! Should probably add this to puredata.org or > something for posterity. Or a bug report since it's obviously a > kludge. If you consider it a kludge, then most of Pd is a kludge. ;) I don't think it's that bad, or at least no worse than any of the other dynamic patching stuff. Maybe slightly better would be a character escaping mechanism like [\$0( Best, Chris. ------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mccormick.cx
_______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
