Thanks, i'll redirect this question to the pd-pdp and pd-unathorized debian maintnener to see what he thinks too.
As for the first (pdp) then it possibly would be a bug for the debian maintener. If the pdp package appears in the unstable with pd 0.40 one could think that pdp is built against pd0.40. As for the second i must say that i checked the lame libraries (which btw are available in Debian in the non-free section), and i have them. Therefore the question is, is there a specific version needed by the mp3xxx set? Or a specific name or dir where the mp3xx look for? Unless this will be fixed whitin debian itself i will certainly follow your recommendations. muchas gracias, marco Alle 18:51, lunedì 19 febbraio 2007, Yves Degoyon ha scritto: > Marco Trevisani wrote: > >really sorry for duplicated messages.... i had a problem with the mailer > > and the first was shot... with no subject (not good for the archive) > > > >Hi everybody, > > > >i had to make an installation from scratch on a laptop. a clean debian, > >unstable installation. > > two answers : > > * the PDP debian package you installed is old, > and not build for pd 0.40, hence these errors. > compile pdp from source from the DARCS repository : > http://zwizwa.fartit.com/zwikizwaki.php?page=PureDataPacket > > * you're missing lame library for the mp3 objects, > and you also have to compile it from source, > as i don't know if there is a debian pakage of it, > for licensing issues > > suerte, > sevy > > _______________________________________________ > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list