Hallo, marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote: > I don't know how easy/difficult an implementation of new variable names > would be. I would give most priority to any kind of $0 feature in messages. > and then the next step for me would be to differentiate between > $-variables (in messages) and # or ? or @ variables in patches. that way > you would not break backwards compatibility, and a #0 or ?0 or @0 in a > message or an object would behave like the old $0 var in objects.
ATM I cannot think of a way, that introduces # as a substitute for $ in "$1 ..." messages, that would *not* break backwards compatibility: What if someone already used #1 in a message to mean just a literal "#1"? Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__ _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
