On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 15:03 -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Jamie Bullock wrote: > > > BUT, I don't think dynamic patching in Pd as it currently stands is > > officially supported (by Miller), > > It's quite useless to say that, unless you are interested in the > philosophical aspects of whether dynamic patching is a feature of pd, what > is a feature, and the meaning of "official" and perhaps of "is". At least > several commands of dynamic patching are so much used that Miller can't > remove them, and if he did, then Hans would put them back anyway. > > > and unexpected things can happen! > > What are you talking about? >
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2007-09/053892.html ...unless you are interested in the philosophical aspects of whether crashing is a feature of pd, and the meaning of "unexpected" in the context of the following: > > "init" is one of many messages that Pd and its gui send back and forth, which > > aren't intended to have any user-level functionality... of course, some > > of those messages like "connect" have proved useful at the user level; but > > none of them are guaranteed to do anything useful or even to be safe. The > > only one that's "supported" is "dsp" for turning audio computation on and > > off. Jamie -- www.postlude.co.uk _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
