On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Chris McCormick wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 03:03:22PM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Jamie Bullock wrote:
BUT, I don't think dynamic patching in Pd as it currently stands is
officially supported (by Miller),
It's quite useless to say that, unless you are interested in the
philosophical aspects of whether dynamic patching is a feature of pd, what
is a feature, and the meaning of "official" and perhaps of "is". At least
several commands of dynamic patching are so much used that Miller can't
remove them, and if he did, then Hans would put them back anyway.
Incorrect; this statement is not at all useless for people who's primary
Pd platform is Miller's version, on the contrary it's quite true, and of
great concen.
Oh yeah, it's of great concern. You'd have to download a diff that
modifies Miller's pd so that it becomes as sane or insane as you want it
to be, and then use /usr/bin/patch to modify Miller's source, unless
someone provides a prepatched version of Miller's source that is not
Hans'.
I strongly suspect that dynamic patching features won't change or be
removed in Miller's pd anyway.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
