Wait, isn't OSC GNU? Deja vu for some reason... ~Kyle
On Jan 4, 2008 10:23 PM, Chris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:26:56PM +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote: > > There will be no direct support for OSC in [sssad] unless Miller > > decides to include some OSCroute-variant in plain Pd, as sssad will > > never require externals. > > Has anyone lobbied Miller for this feature? > > I would love to hear what Miller thinks about OSC in Pd canonical. I > queried this in 2005 > <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2005-11/033012.html> but > he never replied to that thread. > > Seems to me that OSC is as valuable to users as MIDI is these days. As > many bits of software use OSC now as bits of hardware use MIDI, and > even competing commercial products use OSC. Also, the code is there, > ready to go into Pd cannonical quite easily. > > Best, > > Chris. > > ------------------- > http://mccormick.cx > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > -- ----- ------------ ---- ----- ---- -------- - ------ http://perhapsidid.wordpress.com http://myspace.com/kyleklipowicz _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
