I'd still have to track changes in the OSC code and periodically "import" them to the Pd sources, which is very error-prone.
... and to answer Mathieu's question as to why I prefer FUDI, it's just simpler. cheers Miller On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 02:17:55PM -0500, Martin Peach wrote: > Miller Puckette wrote: > > I'm still thinking about it. On the plus side, it would make Pd users' > > lives easier; on the minus, it would introduce a new library dependence and > > thus reduce Pd's portability. > > > > > Which library is that? If it was integrated into pd the library would be pd. > > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
