Well, portaudio was unavoidable (it's the only patch to coreaudio on Mac and ASIO on Windows.) But that doesnt' make a good reason to add yet others.
And yes, I think FUDI is much better than OSC, thank you :) On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 01:48:29PM -0500, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, Miller Puckette wrote: > > >I'm still thinking about it. On the plus side, it would make Pd users' > >lives easier; on the minus, it would introduce a new library dependence > >and thus reduce Pd's portability. > > Oh yeah. And what do you think you're doing with PortAudio? I don't see Pd > depending on an external PortAudio library. Where's the portability > problem? > > >The OSC design is not much better than that of MIDI, in my opinion... > >it's a pity it's so widely adopted. > > Do you mean that FUDI is so much better? How so? > > _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... > | Mathieu Bouchard - t?l:+1.514.383.3801, Montr?al QC Canada > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
