On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:30:19PM +0000, Andy Farnell wrote: > As I see, the unipolar vacuum collapse theory only makes sense, if there > is a chemical reaction that removes CO2, H2O, O2 or N2 from the atmosphere, > (and one assumes no matter is transformed to energy) - well NO2 and O3 > are produced, but that doesn't account for the volume.
Really? I'm not so sure about that. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonoluminesence> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pistol_shrimp> <http://youtube.com/results?search_query=pistol+shrimp&search_type=&search=Search> Chris. ------------------- http://mccormick.cx _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
