On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:58:49 -0500 Chris McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:30:19PM +0000, Andy Farnell wrote: > > As I see, the unipolar vacuum collapse theory only makes sense, if there > > is a chemical reaction that removes CO2, H2O, O2 or N2 from the atmosphere, > > (and one assumes no matter is transformed to energy) - well NO2 and O3 > > are produced, but that doesn't account for the volume. > > Really? I'm not so sure about that. > > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonoluminesence> > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pistol_shrimp> > <http://youtube.com/results?search_query=pistol+shrimp&search_type=&search=Search> I'd love to believe that sound can turn matter into energy, it would really cheer up my day. But I think esoteric explanations of sonoluminesence are quite unnecessary, This looks like plain old "pumping" to me. The smoking gun is the colour...blue-green which is the 337nm emission of nitrogen... which is in air. So it's electronic in nature. No need for mini-black hole theories, the energy comes from the sound and somehow (probably by dipole movement) becomes electromagnetic, excites the nitrogen shell and is re-emitted as a 337nm quanta. Show me a repeatable experiments that demonstrates a clearly measurable change in mass and I'm all for it though. -- Use the source _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
