Come on guys, I thought it was the artist not the tool, that was responsible for making amazing sounds. Maybe since PD is free so more artists get a chance to use it?
When will they come up with the PD to CSound python conversion script? On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Chuckk Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 3:19 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > On Mar 8, 2008, at 5:30 PM, Martin Peach wrote: > > > > > Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > >> It would be very nice to have a "cleansound" library of dsp > > >> objects, perhaps ported from Csound. > > > > > > You can already use [csoundapi~], which comes with most csound > > > varieties, to access anything in csound from pd. > > > > > > Right, but doesn't that mean you write your instruments in Csound, > > then control them in Pd? I was thinking Pd objects using the csound > > code. > > Seems obvious, doesn't it? AFAIK it would be perfectly legal to take > the code directly. > I find [csoundapi~] very useful. I tend to think, if you want Csound, > use Csound, but as a Linux enthusiast I think it's generally better > for an option to exist than to not exist. > How the two programs are structured is a different question. I don't > know for sure, but it might take some substantial changes. Csound > uses vectors and scalars for audio and control signals, somewhat > different than block size. Then again it might translate easily, I > dunno. > Csound has a huge library, some of the more advanced stuff might be > useful too, not just oscillators. > > -Chuckk > > -- > http://www.badmuthahubbard.com > > _______________________________________________ > > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
