[osc~] seems to use a 512-float table with linear interpolation, so it could be made better by increasing the size and/or resolution of the table and/or using a better interpolation algorithm.
Martin Roman Haefeli wrote: > On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 21:05 +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > >> Pd could have better oscillators even with 32bit, by using better >> interpolation/extrapolation algorithms. > > yo.. would be interesting to hear (for non-dsp experts as me), _what_ > could be improved, respectively _what_ is _not_ optimal in pd. could you > (or someone else) elaborate that a bit? are you saying, that [osc~] is > not generating a clean sine wave? what would you expect from a [phasor~] > differently from what it currently does? what kind of algorithms are you > talking about? what are they supposed to improve? > > roman > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________ > Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
