Hallo, Alexandre Porres hat gesagt: // Alexandre Porres wrote: > I tried again, and now it works much better than before... so I guess there > was something wrong before. > > Well Claude, it seems it almost works as the [triangle~] object. > > Do you guys know about this one? It comes in some external library.
Hm, it's pretty common name for a triangle-wave abstraction. We also have one included in s_osc.pd which is the standard multiwaveform oscillator for synth building in rjlib and does sine, tri, pwm-square and saw (the latter two bandlimited). > [triangle~] works in a similar fashion, it goes smoothly from inverse > sawtooth to triangle and the sawtooth depending on the parameter (from 0 to > 1). > > The thing is that Triangle corrects the DC Offset, which could easily be > done in the expr. But now I may start to sound like an obssessed DC Offset > maniac. While the oscillators in s_osc.pd all go from -1 to 1, I don't really see why a triangle wave should not go from 0-1 as well. This may even be useful in certain applications. All it takes to convert it is a multiply-add. And isn't differentiating between ring modulation and amplitude modulation according to where the DC is old school analog thinking? ;) In Pd I prefer to think just about multiplications of one signal with another one. Ciao -- Frank _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
