I can't really say from a supra-atomic standpoint I could agree with
you, but I'd settle for the speed of light, or even the remotely distant
figure of the response time of an op-amp. Which is quite a bit faster
than your average blocksize or even a single discrete sample--assuming
that a complex digital system like Pd could react effectively at
single-sample speed.
Really though, must everything really be so complicated Mathieu? Not
everything can be so easily described with mathematics. I also like to
sip single malt whiskey during the last evening hours of a summer headed
towards autumn...
Sorry to stir up the digital goblins, folks. I merely wanted to share my
(unsatisfactory) experiences with feedback scenarios in Pd. Your Mileage
May Vary.
D.
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Instantaneousness is a myth. It does not exist in nature.
--
::: derek holzer ::: http://blog.myspace.com/macumbista :::
http://www.vimeo.com/macumbista :::
---Oblique Strategy # 148:
"State the problem in words as clearly as possible"
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
