There are plenty of bugs still, but this might be the type of thing one could do without having to code a new object.
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Matt Barber <brbrof...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here's a start -- it requires [s2l] and [l2s] from zexy, though (there > may be a way to do it vanilla, but possibly not). > > Matt > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Mathieu Bouchard <ma...@artengine.ca> wrote: >> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> >>> Someone could write their own message box object and make it do whatever >>> they want. Then you have both: a new interface and backwards compatibility. >>> The message box could just be a GUI object like any other, there is nothing >>> inherently unique about it. >> >> It wouldn't even need to be a "GUI" object. just make it an objectbox class >> named [m]. Then "$1" (etc) becomes the same as in other objectboxes, and >> then another syntax can be used to mean message arguments. Except that if >> it's not a GUI object, then it's not clickable, and stuff. >> >> User-wise, there _is_ something inherently unique to the messagebox, but it >> happens to be exactly the difference that we'd like to eliminate. >> >> _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... >> | Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: +1.514.383.3801 > _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
