That validates my statement to: "do not have the latest version" :) Do you win anything in using Lucid versus Karmic? Karmic has rt, it works like a charm, I can put jack with a latency of 9ms with H4 audio as USB audio card (no drivers no install) and no xruns - running nicely. If I do not use -rt kernel, xruns begin at that latency value.
Best regards, Pedro Lopes 2010/9/13 András Murányi <[email protected]> > Nope. It's gone. > http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1388451 > > Andras > > 2010/9/13 Pedro Lopes <[email protected]> > > Sorry just double checking something András... there's no rt kernel for 64 >> bits Ubuntu? (or you're saying for the lucid lynx?) >> >> Cause karmic koala has rt, I have Ubuntu Studio 64 bits with rt [1] >> >> [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuStudio/9.10release_notes >> >> 2010/9/13 András Murányi <[email protected]> >> >>> Ahh, livna.... >>> You know, know that i have convinced my Fedora friends to switch to >>> Ubuntu, what do I tall them when i go back? :o) >>> I'll take a look at it, and also at home-brewing a kernel. Maybe that's >>> the way forward. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Andras >>> >>> >>> 2010/9/13 Bernardo Barros <[email protected]> >>> >>>> Then you have to add Fusion free+non-free (maybe livna?) to your repos. >>>> >>>> >>>> 2010/9/13 András Murányi <[email protected]>: >>>> > Hhh, switching distro seems harder than moving to another country >>>> > sometimes... :o) >>>> > I heard that some non-free stuff if missing from Fedora, does CCRMA >>>> have >>>> > these? Like some proprietary codecs, etc... >>>> > >>>> > 2010/9/13 Bernardo Barros <[email protected]> >>>> >> >>>> >> yes, planet_ccrma is a repo for the Fedora/CentOS/RedHat family >>>> >> I like it >>>> >> >>>> >> 2010/9/13 András Murányi <[email protected]>: >>>> >> > Hmm, hmm. That means switching to Fedora, right? >>>> >> > >>>> >> > 2010/9/13 Bernardo Barros <[email protected]> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> Planet CCRMA offers rt-kernel for x86_64 systems. Give it a try. >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> 2010/9/13 András Murányi <[email protected]>: >>>> >> >> > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:59 PM, jm jones <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> Hi, usually I install the 64 bits version of, but the last >>>> time, I >>>> >> >> >> dont remember why : ) (maybe to avoid any problems) I installed >>>> the >>>> >> >> >> 32 >>>> >> >> >> bits version of Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. Is a repo of pd-extended for >>>> 10.04 >>>> >> >> >> available? >>>> >> >> >> And about the 32 vs 64 bits, what are your choices? And what >>>> about >>>> >> >> >> distros? Pure:dyne seems more lightweight with his xfce >>>> desktop, >>>> >> >> >> however I have a good processor (core 2 duo intel e7200) and >>>> 2gb of >>>> >> >> >> ram, planning an update to 6gb, so I dont know if xfce is a >>>> must for >>>> >> >> >> me. >>>> >> >> >> Im a "veteran" gnu/linux user, but the last years I was using >>>> OS X >>>> >> >> >> and >>>> >> >> >> W7 for music making. In Linux I want to use pd, Renoise (its >>>> >> >> >> available >>>> >> >> >> as 64 bits too), and wine for some vsts. >>>> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > Hi There, >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> >> > I'm sort of a veteran too (started on IBM AIX in 1992, used Red >>>> Hat >>>> >> >> > for >>>> >> >> > a >>>> >> >> > long time, then went back to Windows 98, later XP, which i gave >>>> up >>>> >> >> > finally a >>>> >> >> > few years ago). >>>> >> >> > I'm using vanilla Ubuntu 10.04 64-bit with Gnome (and 2GB of >>>> memory), >>>> >> >> > and my >>>> >> >> > impression is that it's not the WM that makes things slow, but >>>> in the >>>> >> >> > case >>>> >> >> > of Pd, it's Pd itself. Read the archives on GUI<->core >>>> communication >>>> >> >> > and >>>> >> >> > Tcl/Tk weirdnesses. The 64-bit version of Pd is quite tidy now, >>>> well >>>> >> >> > actually there was a time when it seemed to me a bit slower than >>>> the >>>> >> >> > 32-bit >>>> >> >> > version, but AFAIK there's no reason for that any more (?) >>>> >> >> > With a decent CPU and that huge amount of RAM you (will) have, >>>> it >>>> >> >> > really >>>> >> >> > cannot be a question of WM whatsoever. Of course, the system has >>>> to >>>> >> >> > be >>>> >> >> > tuned >>>> >> >> > for realtime, undisturbed audio usage, which may include getting >>>> rid >>>> >> >> > of >>>> >> >> > eye-candy functions, but i never experienced a problem with >>>> those. >>>> >> >> > After >>>> >> >> > all, they use openGL, don't they? >>>> >> >> > The same stands for pure:dyne; at the core it's a linux kernel, >>>> and >>>> >> >> > what >>>> >> >> > you >>>> >> >> > install on (or remove from) the top, it's up to you. >>>> >> >> > The only thing i'm missing here on 64-bit is the RT kernel. Once >>>> i >>>> >> >> > find >>>> >> >> > a >>>> >> >> > nice quick way, i'll grab it, but i'm not really into >>>> home-brewing my >>>> >> >> > kernel. :) >>>> >> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Muranyi Andras >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Muranyi Andras >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> [email protected] mailing list >>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Pedro Lopes (ongoing MSc) >> contact: [email protected] >> website: http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes >> > > > > -- > Muranyi Andras > -- Pedro Lopes (ongoing MSc) contact: [email protected] website: http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
