Or use the "magic" of [lop~] (which I really completely understood from
Andy's book Designing Sound), and the approach suggested by hans.
Lorenzo.
On 21/10/2011 09:08, Andy Farnell wrote:
Has anyone tried a VCS3 style crosspoint patch in Pd,
but then replace the cross switches with quick crossfaders?
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:55:22 +0200
Roman Haefeli<reduz...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Pat
It's logical problem. You cannot have the signal path having both
possible orders at the same time. If you want to switch the order, you
need to re-create the path. This could be done by dynamically
disconnecting wires and re-creating them in the other order. However,
this causes recompilation of the DSP graph. Certainly you cannot do it
with [send~]/[receive~] pairs. There will alway one pair that introduces
a block size delay.
They only idea I can come up with is not very scalable. You create both
possible paths in parallel and switch~ them on and off as needed.
However, this only guarantees not to create any DSP hickups. Turning on
and off instantaneously causes some effects to create glitches
(non-continuous signal).
Roman
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 21:44 -0400, patrick wrote:
hi everyone,
i would like to make a patch with multiple fx~ _but_ is it possible to
chain the fx~ and change the order without a single glitch in the dsp.
as an example:
[adc~]
|
[reverb~]
|
[distortion~]
|
[dac~]
now pressing a bang and automagically:
[adc~]
|
[distortion~]
|
[reverb~]
|
[dac~]
is it possible in pd?
thanks,
pat
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
