On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 23:48 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > I think the way you'd do it to prevent glitches is to have them in > subpatches, always attached, and then turn them on and off with a [*~] > and a [switch~].
How are you gonna patch this without creating DSP loops? Roman > On Oct 20, 2011, at 9:44 PM, patrick wrote: > > > hi everyone, > > > > i would like to make a patch with multiple fx~ _but_ is it possible to > > chain the fx~ and change the order without a single glitch in the dsp. > > as an example: > > > > [adc~] > > | > > [reverb~] > > | > > [distortion~] > > | > > [dac~] > > > > now pressing a bang and automagically: > > > > [adc~] > > | > > [distortion~] > > | > > [reverb~] > > | > > [dac~] > > > > is it possible in pd? > > thanks, > > pat > > > > _______________________________________________ > > [email protected] mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > "[W]e have invented the technology to eliminate scarcity, but we are > deliberately throwing it away to benefit those who profit from > scarcity." -John Gilmore > > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
