You could make an abstraction that includes the effects that you are
interested in. So it would be a limited set. Then you can chain these
freely, and switch them between the effects.
.hc
On Oct 21, 2011, at 2:44 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
How are you gonna patch this without creating DSP loops?
Roman
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 23:48 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I think the way you'd do it to prevent glitches is to have them in
subpatches, always attached, and then turn them on and off with a
[*~]
and a [switch~].
On Oct 20, 2011, at 9:44 PM, patrick wrote:
hi everyone,
i would like to make a patch with multiple fx~ _but_ is it
possible to
chain the fx~ and change the order without a single glitch in the
dsp.
as an example:
[adc~]
|
[reverb~]
|
[distortion~]
|
[dac~]
now pressing a bang and automagically:
[adc~]
|
[distortion~]
|
[reverb~]
|
[dac~]
is it possible in pd?
thanks,
pat
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"[W]e have invented the technology to eliminate scarcity, but we are
deliberately throwing it away to benefit those who profit from
scarcity." -John Gilmore
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
You can't steal a gift. Bird gave the world his music, and if you can
hear it, you can have it. - Dizzy Gillespie
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
