Wouldn't you need to get permission from Ircam, too?

They are listed as a copyrightholder, for example, in vexp.c.

There is also the following list of authors:
* Authors: Maurizio De Cecco, Francois Dechelle, Enzo Maggi, Norbert Schnell.

-Jonathan




>________________________________
>From: i go bananas <[email protected]>
>To: Hans-Christoph Steiner <[email protected]>
>Cc: PD-List <[email protected]>; Georg Bosch <[email protected]>
>Sent: Monday, October 31, 2011 11:04 AM
>Subject: Re: [PD] expr alternative
>
>
>i just got a reply and they are reviewing my question, so hopefully we can 
>find out if they currently allow LGPL.
>
>however, even if the do, i PERSONALLY still think a BSD [expr] would be much 
>better.
>
>i know there were a lot of heated comments in this thread defending GPL, but 
>if the author of the object would prefer to go with BSD, and if all that keeps 
>him from doing the work is a little time and motivation, well, i can't really 
>give him any time, but i can maybe help with motivation.
>
>Am i on my own if i try to do that?
>
>
>
>
>On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>Another side of it is that the GPL and LGPL do not allow additional 
>>restrictions to be placed on the code.  The VLC and GNU Go complaints as I 
>>understood them were specifically about the Apple App Store placing 
>>additional restrictions on the code.  So that would affect LGPL and GPL 
>>alike.  An app that includes some LGPL code might be a grey area since there 
>>is no possible expectation of producing a binary exactly like the original, 
>>since not all the code's licenses require that, so distributing the LGPL part 
>>separate might be enough.
>>
>>With the GPL, the whole app needs to be GPL compatible, so therefore there is 
>>an easy test: every user must be able to freely recreate the binary, and 
>>freely install, run, and modify it.  That's something that the Apple App 
>>Store definitely restricts.
>>
>>I don't think this will really be resolved until Apple drops those terms or 
>>the FSF makes a statement on the LGPL in the Apple App Store.
>>
>>.hc
>>
>>
>>On Oct 31, 2011, at 10:49 AM, i go bananas wrote:
>>
>>> i just called a couple of apple numbers.  first one had me on hold for 10 
>>> minutes so i  gave up, 2nd one was useless.
>>>
>>> BUT third one was a rather helpful lady whose name i now have and she has 
>>> issued me a 'case number' so my question is now listed in their system at 
>>> least, so hopefully i can get the 'yay or nay' from apple on LGPL code in 
>>> iOS applications.
>>>
>>> Also, i have already contacted a friend who works for a company making high 
>>> profile iOS applications, and from what he is saying LGPL is OK.
>>> it seems the main problem with plain GPL is that apple doesn't want to 
>>> release their own surrounding code, which the GPL would force them to do.
>>> As far as i can see, LGPL doesn't have this strict requirement.  You just 
>>> need to make the LGPL part available to anyone who wants it.
>>>
>>> Will keep hammering away here.  LGPL sounds like it might be a better 
>>> option, but i still reckon if Mr Yadegari is in favour of BSD, then that 
>>> would be the best outcome.
>>> Personally i'd be happy to donate a couple of hundred dollars even to see a 
>>> unified license for PD, but as this thread has shown, it sounds like i may 
>>> get hippies camping on my lawn waving their GPL flags and trying to bum my 
>>> goldfish.
>>>
>>> Just casually browsing through a bunch of PD patches this afternoon though, 
>>> [expr] and especially [expr~] are undeniably useful and show up in so many 
>>> patches.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> [email protected] mailing list
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>You can't steal a gift. Bird gave the world his music, and if you can hear 
>>it, you can have it. - Dizzy Gillespie
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>[email protected] mailing list
>UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
>http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to