On 06/15/13 16:03, Max wrote: > So that is a confirmed Gem problem. I don't see the point to work with that > object any more, now that I know that the new version breaks backward > compatibility. I want to be able to make a patch that works with whatever gem > version : (
i think that' a bitter conclusion to draw. obviously the object should be backwards compatible, and it being not is a bug. rather than ranting about "not seeing the point any mor" it would be good to help fix the bug. fgdstn IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
