On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 18:18 +0200, Jack wrote: > Le 05/06/2013 22:17, Max a écrit : > > wow, this looks so wrong! (your screenshot) > > I have no idea why this is. > > > > I just tried it under Linux mint 15 (through ssh- XY from os x) > > > > Pd 0.43.2 > > GEM: ver: 0.93.3 > > GEM: compiled: Sep 6 2012 > > > > and it works perfectly there. > > > > on my other machine, os x > > 0.44.0-extended-20130213 > > GEM: ver: 0.93.3 > > GEM: compiled: Nov 10 2011 > > > > it also runs nicely. > > > > I'm afraid I don't know why it isn't running on your machine. > > can anyone else try it? > > > > max > > > > > > Am 04.06.2013 um 13:38 schrieb Antoine Villeret > > <antoine.ville...@gmail.com>: > > > >> hi, > >> > >> 2013/6/2 Max <abonneme...@revolwear.com> > >> > >> Am 30.05.2013 um 14:06 schrieb Antoine Villeret > >> <antoine.ville...@gmail.com>: > >> > >>> hi, > >>> > >>> I'm sorry it still doesn't work > >>> and I can't find values that works well on the testbed.mov video... > >>> > >>> I don't know why, tell me if you want more info or snapshots > >> Did you download all of the files, especially the abstractions you'll need > >> for 07b-multi-blobtracker-IDs.pd? > >> i've cloned the Bewegungsmelder repository > >> Were there any messages, errors, warnings in the console? > >> nothing explaining that in the console, nothing in the terminal > >> > >> with quicktime4linux or gmerlin backend : > >> [pix_film:audio_ffmpeg] Codec not found: FFmpeg Sonic decoder > >> [pix_film]: loaded file: /home/antoine/pd/Bewegungsmelder/testbed.mov with > >> 623 frames (480x320) at 25.000000 fps > >> > >> > >> > >> What OS and Pd/Gem version are you using? > >> Ubuntu 12.04 > >> Pd 44.2 > >> Gem 0.93.git f890f4d > >> > >> here is attached a screenshot of what i get > >> > >> I was guessing a video decompression artefact but I got the same result > >> with all the backends I have that can open testbed.mov (quicktime4linux > >> and gmerlin) > >> but I got the same result with both... > >> > >> I also converted the video to mjpeg and to h264 and got the same... > >> very strange... > >> > >> + > >> a > >> > >> m. > >> > >> <Capture du 2013-06-04 13:06:45.png> > Hello Max, > > I have the same results than Antoine. > A screenshot is attached. > Configuration : > Ubuntu 13.04, Pd 0.44.3, Gem ver: 0.93.git 374f713.
Just an uneducated guess: Could it be that this is caused by objects being positioned on the same Z-plane (or quite close to each other) so that some overlapping occurs on some gfx cards, but not on some others? Roman _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list