Touché :-)
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 1:15 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig <[email protected]> wrote: > On 01/18/2014 06:59 PM, Pall Thayer wrote: > > Ah... I've seen this in some of the help patches. Why would someone do it > > with multiple [+~] instead of a single [*~]? There's no difference? > > aesthetic reasons? > hinting at bigger structures? > > but consider this: why would someone write the following code? > > #!/usr/bin/perl > > sleep((8*60)*60); > > it does the same as the following (which is slightly faster): > > #!/usr/bin/perl > > sleep(28800); > > > gfamdsr > IOhannes > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > -- ***************************** Pall Thayer artist http://pallthayer.dyndns.org *****************************
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
