this whole thread is about a typo? i have never seen
[sig~] |\ [+~] |\ [+~] but have often seen [sig~] |\ [*~] |\ [+~] On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Dan Wilcox <danomat...@gmail.com> wrote: > Chances are Jonathan has already cleaned that up :D (Thanks for all the > help file updates J!) > > On Jan 19, 2014, at 6:00 AM, pd-list-requ...@iem.at wrote: > > *From: *Pall Thayer <pallt...@gmail.com> > *Subject: **Re: [PD] signal math explanation* > *Date: *January 18, 2014 at 2:48:04 PM EST > *To: *Jonathan Wilkes <jancs...@yahoo.com> > *Cc: *pd-list <pd-list@iem.at>, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoel...@iem.at> > > > I don't know. I recall seeing it somewhere years ago. > > > On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Jonathan Wilkes <jancs...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Pall, >> Which help patches? I haven't seen a single help patch that >> substitutes strings of [+~] to double the incoming signal where a simple >> multiplication would do. >> >> I have seen cascades of [+~] for additive synthesis, but that's not the >> same. >> > > -------- > Dan Wilcox > @danomatika > danomatika.com > robotcowboy.com > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > >
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
