oh and of course, i made a typo myself! that last [+~] should be a [*~]
doh! On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:24 AM, i go bananas <[email protected]> wrote: > this whole thread is about a typo? > > i have never seen > > [sig~] > |\ > [+~] > |\ > [+~] > > > > but have often seen > > [sig~] > |\ > [*~] > |\ > [+~] > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Dan Wilcox <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Chances are Jonathan has already cleaned that up :D (Thanks for all the >> help file updates J!) >> >> On Jan 19, 2014, at 6:00 AM, [email protected] wrote: >> >> *From: *Pall Thayer <[email protected]> >> *Subject: **Re: [PD] signal math explanation* >> *Date: *January 18, 2014 at 2:48:04 PM EST >> *To: *Jonathan Wilkes <[email protected]> >> *Cc: *pd-list <[email protected]>, IOhannes m zmölnig <[email protected]> >> >> >> I don't know. I recall seeing it somewhere years ago. >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Jonathan Wilkes <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Pall, >>> Which help patches? I haven't seen a single help patch that >>> substitutes strings of [+~] to double the incoming signal where a simple >>> multiplication would do. >>> >>> I have seen cascades of [+~] for additive synthesis, but that's not the >>> same. >>> >> >> -------- >> Dan Wilcox >> @danomatika >> danomatika.com >> robotcowboy.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> [email protected] mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> >> >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
