I haven't checked the status of any of those patches in a long time. I posted many in the patch tracker, did those get included? I used to maintain the pd-extended git repo as a branch that always showed the pd-extended changes as a series of commits on top of Pd-vanilla's git. That is called the 'patch_series' branch in the pd-extended.git. But then so many of my patches did not get accepted, I abandoned that approach since it was too much work. More recently, I reversed it, treating vanilla's git as a source of patches for Pd-extended.
.hc Miller Puckette wrote: > I remember seeing a series of patches (code diffs I mean) that made the > necessary changes to Pd vanilla to Pd extended - does anyone know if these > still exist? (I couldn't find them when I looked at the Pd extended SVN > repository a few weeks ago). > > Some of them should be in Pd vanilla anyway, and if I took that part on it > would make the rest a lot easier. > > cheers > Miller > > On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 01:44:11PM -0400, Dan Wilcox wrote: >> I talked to Hans about this a bit. In essence, it involves bringing in the >> new pd vanilla source and making sure the Pd-extended >> additions/modifications aren't lost. With the updates/cleanups to the tcl/tk >> sources a few years ago (great work Hans et al!), it should be alot easier >> than the previous extended releases. But still, *easy* or not, it involves >> time. >> >> On Sep 21, 2014, at 6:00 AM, [email protected] wrote: >> >>> From: Alexandre Torres Porres <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: [PD] [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: Updated pd-extended >>> Date: September 20, 2014 at 5:02:59 PM EDT >>> To: Billy Stiltner <[email protected]> >>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> I wish I knew something about coding to help out with its development :P I >>> do care a lot about it though and wish I could help in some other way. >>> >>> I do see a few problems with extended, but they're basically related to >>> some of the externals and libraries that sometimes do not work as they >>> should, have bad and messy help files and are sometimes redundanct. If >>> welcome, I could help sharing my thoughts and two cents about that, but I >>> realize those are not actual bug fixes regarding the code, so it's not a >>> priority on its to do list and issues for being updated to another release. >>> >>> Anyway, while were at it, what kind of work exactly do you mean someone >>> would have to do? I suppose there is a great list of bug fixes just to keep >>> it basically what it is. Given the context, I'm not assuming any big to do >>> list for some new features agenda. But besidesthe bug fixes, how hard is it >>> for someone to just update to the latest vanilla core? >>> >>> Well, since Pd is an open source project that relies on community effort, >>> and this is the list of its main developers and users, I guess this is the >>> place to talk about a collaboration and see if we can get Pd-extended's >>> development >>> to continue. >>> >>> I'd to help in any way I can. >>> >>> Cheers >> >> -------- >> Dan Wilcox >> @danomatika >> danomatika.com >> robotcowboy.com >> >> >> >> >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> [email protected] mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
