> Unfortunately [osc~] doesn't have the tonal quality I'm after

how is that?

2015-08-23 17:35 GMT-03:00 Julian Brooks <[email protected]>:

> Alexandre & Alexandros,
>
> Cheers for pitching in.
>
> It's for a random bleepy patch.
> Unfortunately [osc~] doesn't have the tonal quality I'm after - good idea
> though.
>
> On 23 August 2015 at 20:53, Alexandre Torres Porres <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> i do realize that, but who knows what he needs this for, it may work... :)
>>
>> 2015-08-23 16:37 GMT-03:00 Alexandros Drymonitis <[email protected]>:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> you can treat [osc~] as [cos~]
>>>>
>>>> just give it a frequency of "0" and use the phase inlet as the angle
>>>> input (from 0 to 1).
>>>>
>>> But the phase inlet of [osc~] is a control inlet, and [cos~] takes
>>> signals..
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> [email protected] mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to