cause I made some tests, [osc~] will give the same result as [cos~]... 2015-08-24 3:26 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <[email protected]>:
> > Unfortunately [osc~] doesn't have the tonal quality I'm after > > how is that? > > 2015-08-23 17:35 GMT-03:00 Julian Brooks <[email protected]>: > >> Alexandre & Alexandros, >> >> Cheers for pitching in. >> >> It's for a random bleepy patch. >> Unfortunately [osc~] doesn't have the tonal quality I'm after - good idea >> though. >> >> On 23 August 2015 at 20:53, Alexandre Torres Porres <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> i do realize that, but who knows what he needs this for, it may work... >>> :) >>> >>> 2015-08-23 16:37 GMT-03:00 Alexandros Drymonitis <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> you can treat [osc~] as [cos~] >>>>> >>>>> just give it a frequency of "0" and use the phase inlet as the angle >>>>> input (from 0 to 1). >>>>> >>>> But the phase inlet of [osc~] is a control inlet, and [cos~] takes >>>> signals.. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> [email protected] mailing list >>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
