Hi Julian, I've never used [cos~], can you explain to me why an [osc~] with the correct phase cannot do the trick?
Cheers On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Julian Brooks <[email protected]> wrote: > Some good stuff here, thanks people. > > [osc~] doesn't appear to take arguments so that's out. > I don't doubt Alexandre's ears or thoroughness but in this instance,when > replacing [cos~] with [osc~] there's a big difference in the sound. > Alexandros - thanks for the sketch, yes it does make sense, webpd has no > [until] or [cos]. > Joe- nice implementation, again unfortunately there's no [abs~] or [wrap~]. > > What I do think from the hints and suggestions given is that I've got > enough to be getting on with to make something approximately close and > hopefully interesting. > > Thanks all for suggestions so far, > > Julian > > On 24 August 2015 at 10:30, Joe White <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Julian, >> >> I've attached an optimised implementation for [cos~] that we've been >> using for Heavy. It's an approximate taylor series expansion but it should >> be much faster than just using cosf(). Hopefully webpd supports [abs~] and >> [wrap~]. >> >> Cheers, >> Joe >> >> On 24 August 2015 at 09:18, Alexandros Drymonitis <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> what about this? >>> >>> [table_size( >>> | >>> [until] >>> | >>> [f]x[+ 1] >>> | >>> [t f f]__________ >>> | | >>> [/ table_size] | >>> | | >>> [* twoPi] | >>> | | >>> [cos] | >>> | | >>> [tabwrite table name] >>> >>> >>> well, ASCII patches don't look so good, but I hope you get the picture. >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Alexandre Torres Porres < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> cause I made some tests, [osc~] will give the same result as [cos~]... >>>> >>>> 2015-08-24 3:26 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> > Unfortunately [osc~] doesn't have the tonal quality I'm after >>>>> >>>>> how is that? >>>>> >>>>> 2015-08-23 17:35 GMT-03:00 Julian Brooks <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>>> Alexandre & Alexandros, >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers for pitching in. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's for a random bleepy patch. >>>>>> Unfortunately [osc~] doesn't have the tonal quality I'm after - good >>>>>> idea though. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 23 August 2015 at 20:53, Alexandre Torres Porres <[email protected] >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> i do realize that, but who knows what he needs this for, it may >>>>>>> work... :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2015-08-23 16:37 GMT-03:00 Alexandros Drymonitis <[email protected]>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> you can treat [osc~] as [cos~] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> just give it a frequency of "0" and use the phase inlet as the >>>>>>>>> angle input (from 0 to 1). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But the phase inlet of [osc~] is a control inlet, and [cos~] takes >>>>>>>> signals.. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> [email protected] mailing list >>>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>>>>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> [email protected] mailing list >>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> [email protected] mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > -- *Sébastien Piquemal* -----* @sebpiq* ----- http://github.com/sebpiq ----- http://funktion.fm
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
