>>and trying to make bold the not-bold.ttf gives bad results.
>I'm not using Dan's branch... I'm using the regular Pd Vanilla 0.47-1 Good to know, >trying it with bold doesn't change the objects size, as you said it didn't >happen in windows... Good to know also. >It's just really hard on the eyes and makes it really hard to read any text >because bold was never intended to be the "regular" default font... no font in >the world was designed to be used as bold by default... or italic... or >bold/italic... that's why they are "bold" or "italic" and not regular... If you open a patch with grater font size, “list of objects” for example, looks bad with Bold? >It makes sense to have those options just to highlight and outline some parts >of the text, but pd's comment do not allow that... so I wonder why the >possibility of hardcoding it to bold exists at all... let alone be the >default, and if linux people really thought that was nice, I really wonder why >and would like to hear about it - I just can't see why so far... Seems OSX users are not used to Bold. Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas.
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
