On 07/20/2017 10:19 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > On 07/20/2017 10:09 PM, Max wrote: >> It stayed the same with test3. Is anyone else running it fine with Jack >> on Linux? I'd like to compare the setup (jack versions??) to help narrow >> it down. > > > yes, i'm running Pd with jack without a problem (Debian/sid)
jackd2: 1.9.10+20150825git1ed50c92~dfsg-5 so i think we *do* need a backtrace. compile Pd with "--enable-debug", then: ~~~ $ gdb ./pd (gdb) run [...] (gdb) bt ~~~ (in your last attempt you forgot the crucial last command "bt", which will print out the actual backtrace) don't get confused by the "watchdog: signaling pd..." messages (i suggested to use "-nrt" to get rid of those messages; but since the problem can only be seen with "-rt", you have to get through that...or remove the offending line src/s_watchdog.c:49 before recompilation...) you might also want to read [1] to produce an even better backtrace. gfmsard IOhannes [1] https://wiki.debian.org/HowToGetABacktrace#Running_gdb
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
