I have a function which blows up at a certain point, moves to infinity. In this case, it is basically 1/0.
I was a little surprised to find that 1/0 = 0 (according to Pd). I was expecting NaN, or an overflow condition would could be trapped. So what I have to do is examine the *input* for the values which will blow up my function, and set a flag. While this is easy in this single case, it is awkward in the general case. This seems somewhat broken to me. Is this a bug? Thanks BH -- William Huston: [email protected] Binghamton NY *Public Service Mapping / Videography / Research* Blog <http://WilliamAHuston.blogspot.com> -- Facebook <http://facebook.com/billhuston> -- Twitter <http://twitter.com/WilliamAHuston>-- Youtube <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGijK1amWOLglT3YeTyEBNQ?sub_congfirmation=1> Document collections: VirtualPipelines <http://TinyURL.com/VirtualPipelines> -- BHDCSDimockArchive <http://bit.ly/BHDCSDimockArchive> Please support my work: TinyURL.com/DonateToBillHuston
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
