Just don’t allow your function to blow up in the first place. On Thursday, May 24, 2018, William Huston <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have a function which blows up at a certain point, moves to infinity. > In this case, it is basically 1/0. > > I was a little surprised to find that 1/0 = 0 (according to Pd). > I was expecting NaN, or an overflow condition would could be trapped. > > So what I have to do is examine the *input* for the values > which will blow up my function, and set a flag. While this > is easy in this single case, it is awkward in the general case. > > This seems somewhat broken to me. > Is this a bug? > > Thanks > BH > > > -- > William Huston: [email protected] > Binghamton NY > > *Public Service Mapping / Videography / Research* > Blog <http://WilliamAHuston.blogspot.com> -- Facebook > <http://facebook.com/billhuston> -- Twitter > <http://twitter.com/WilliamAHuston>-- Youtube > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGijK1amWOLglT3YeTyEBNQ?sub_congfirmation=1> > Document collections: VirtualPipelines > <http://TinyURL.com/VirtualPipelines> -- BHDCSDimockArchive > <http://bit.ly/BHDCSDimockArchive> > Please support my work: TinyURL.com/DonateToBillHuston > > >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
