Thank you all for your responses! I think I've found a solution that can work. Basically what I did was create an abstraction where the first argument is $0 and has a receive object inside with the name $1-parent. It was right under my nose the whole time, but thank you all for helping me sniff it out!
Best, Francis On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:55 PM Christof Ressi <[email protected]> wrote: > changing the receiver is dangerous (as in: could crash your system). > > Yes. Actually, I've experimented with different ways to make it safe, see: > > https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/614 > > or > > https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/849 > > I think the second version is not too unreasonable. > > Christof > > > On 25.03.2020 17:27, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > > On 3/25/20 5:04 PM, Ingo wrote: > > If you don't have any problem with using externals you can use > [iemlib/iem_send]. > > what's that for? > > i mean: what is the advantage over [send] (without arguments)? > > > That's what I use. There is also a [iem_receive] in case that you > happen to need that. > > changing the receiver is dangerous (as in: could crash your system). > > > gfmdasr > IOhannes > > > > _______________________________________________pd-l...@lists.iem.at mailing > list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
