IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
changing the receiver is dangerous (as in: could crash your system).
really ? that's (bad) news to me.
how so ? why could that crash a system ?
and why is it not dangerous to change the receiver in the signal domain ?
would you say, it's "saver" to do dynamic patching if a [receive] has to
be flexible ? (i.e. create and destroy vanilla [recieve] objects in a
subpatch when they need to have another address)
(atm i use [iem_receive] quite a lot in my patches ...)
thanks for any insight
oliver
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
