Em sex., 16 de fev. de 2024 às 04:39, cyrille henry <c...@chnry.net> escreveu:
> Le 15/02/2024 à 06:19, Alexandre Torres Porres a écrit : > I don't understand what is a "spring link motion". > Masses moves according to newton law. > Lot's of different behaviours can be modelled with MSS model... > Sorry, I'm just missing the basics so I can even properly elaborate meaningful questions. I've been avoiding getting into Physical Modelling Synthesis but I guess it's finally time to get into it :) > you can have a look at few of chdh work : > https://vimeo.com/130239547 > http://chdh.net/video_spin.php#; > this is 100% scanned synthesis. > This is amazing, congrats, it made me nostalgic and miss PdCon concerts. you probably noticed that they all use the same equation > not at all :) > The 1st is just a very basic implementation : it's not possible to define > a non-linear link for example. > The 2nd one solve them in a very simple scenario : 1 mass and 1 spring. So > it's not possible to create other network. > thanks for clarifying > But if you just want to play with meaningful parameter without > understanding the physics, then pmpd is not for you. > This is what I realize, and I would also like to have some higher level ready made and easy to use toys for simple tasks. > there are lot's of software dedicated to MSS, the equations are all about > the same. > But physical modelling is broader than MSS. > sure, I see Thanks for the references and answers.
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
