Le 20/02/2024 à 17:10, Alexandre Torres Porres a écrit :
Em sáb., 17 de fev. de 2024 às 07:01, cyrille henry <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> escreveu:
if you put 1 mass and 1 spring, you have a 1st order filter.
hmm, ok
or maybe a 2nd order, since it can resonate. sorry, I'm not good at filters.
cheers
c
if you put two 1st order filter one after the other, you have one 2nd order
filter.
So this means that the information that you can have a 2nd order filter like Ringz from
SC is not really "the same" as Spring, the comparison is very crude, so it
seems, and I thought so...
scann synth was propose when a 100 masses simulation need too much CPU to
be computed in real time at audio rate. So the shape of the string was only
computed at data rate.
if you use audio object, then it's not scanned synthesis. it's just PM
audio simulation.
So, your just mixing multiple things here, and I hardly understand this
discussion.
hmmm, yeah, I guess they are not "properly" implementing it in SC, just finding
a way to do it with their resources that comes as close as it is possible...
Well, I'm not sure if it's worth porting SC's Spring into ELSE, they are not
being able to say what it is useful for in their forum... but I ported the
bouncing ball and it seems something way more fun to play with.
Thanks
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
