A "brew file" for PDL seems like a convenience for gurus
and not an out-of-the-box solution for non-expert users
wishing to start with PDL.

--Chris

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Craig DeForest
<defor...@boulder.swri.edu> wrote:
> I currently use Brew for perl and toolchain, and git for pdl itself.
> Setting up a brew file for PDLwouldn't be hard apparently but I have too
> many unfinished projects lying around already.
>
> (Mobile)
>
>
> On Feb 19, 2014, at 7:13 PM, Maggie X <maggie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Any progress here? I recently got forced onto a mac and when I tried to
> install PDL today I couldn't find any SciPDL binaries... Top google results
> pointed to PDL source on sourceforge.
>
> Best,
> Maggie
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Derek Lamb <de...@boulder.swri.edu> wrote:
>>
>> thanks!  nearly 1000 lines of POD:  I'll see what I can do.
>>
>> On Jan 21, 2014, at 2:36 PM, Matthew Kenworthy wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've been trying to build the static version, but I'm stuck on some
>> irritations with F77 not compiling cleanly. Here's the pod on the
>> compilation for SciPDL - anyone who can help me, I'd appreciate it!
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>
>>
>> On 21 January 2014 21:33, Derek Lamb <de...@boulder.swri.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>> Waiting on instructions from Matt.  I'm sure he has notes somewhere but I
>>> can't seem to pry them out of his hands.
>>>
>>> MATT!!  Even unpolished notes would give me a starting place!
>>>
>>> Anyway, I have Snow Leopard, but I'd be willing to upgrade to Mavericks
>>> to get this done.
>>>
>>> Derek
>>>
>>> On Jan 21, 2014, at 1:26 PM, Chris Marshall wrote:
>>>
>>> > bump
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Chris Marshall <devel.chm...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> Mac PDL users/developers-
>>> >>
>>> >> What is the status with the SciPDL release?  I'm hoping
>>> >> that a documented build/test/release process would improve
>>> >> the ease and availability of future PDL releases for the Mac.
>>> >>
>>> >> It would be useful to generate the docs for the process with
>>> >> a SciPDL-2.007 release (Matt?).  Then another PDL Mac
>>> >> user/developer (Derek?) could follow the directions to make
>>> >> a release for the coming PDL-2.008.  That should be a good
>>> >> way to flush out any missing discussion or explanations.  :-)
>>> >>
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >> Chris
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Matthew Kenworthy
>>> >> <kenwor...@strw.leidenuniv.nl> wrote:
>>> >>> I'll have a go at a rebuild - let me know when the issues are
>>> >>> resolved and
>>> >>> I'll go ahead and rebuild.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Matt
>>> >>> ...

_______________________________________________
PDL-porters mailing list
PDL-porters@jach.hawaii.edu
http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/pdl-porters

Reply via email to