On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> From what I've read it seems that some people didn't like
> the criticism leveled at their work. Whether it was the
> criticism they didn't like, the quality of the criticism, or
> the tone of the criticism is irrelevant. If you can't
> handle comments made about your PUG submissions, no matter
> what they are or how they're expressed, don't post to the
> PUG. Putting up pictures in any venue means you're ready to
> accept what people have to say about them.
I agree with this. I didn't care much for the comment I got, but
it was funny to see that other had gotten comments from the guy as
well. It seems like he was just trolling through the PUG, writing up
what he thought of each pic.
I also agree with Bob, unexplained praise is no help. I thank the
feedback some people gave me regarding my image. It made me think that
maybe I was overdoing the "overexposed" look.
I wouldn't care too much about changing the wording in the pug pages.
If anything, "contact the photographer", as someone suggested, seems
the most neutral way to describe the link.
j
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Juan J. Buhler | FX Animator @ PDI | http://www.crosswinds.net/~jbuhler
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, visit
http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
Don't forget to visit the PUG at http://pug.komkon.org