on 2/7/01 10:18 PM, Gerald Cermak at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I ran across this one as a cheap (< $200) 1800 dpi 35mm film scanner. At a > full 36-bits with twain, it might work as an interim scanning solution for Have not used it but found some VERY bad user comments when I did a seach for info. Color problems, multiple defective units, sudden temporary failures. Decidied not to try one. JeffW. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Anyone using the Pacific-Image Prime-Film 1800U sc... Gerald Cermak
- Re: Anyone using the Pacific-Image Prime-Film... Colin & Linda McKie
- Re: Anyone using the Pacific-Image Prime-... Chris Brogden
- !!OT!!Re: Anyone using the Pacific-Im... Colin & Linda McKie
- Re: (HP adapter) Anyone using the... Paul Jones
- Re: (HP adapter) Anyone usin... Peter Alling
- Re: (HP adapter) Anyone usin... Flavio Minelli
- Re: Anyone using the Pacific-Image Pr... Colin & Linda McKie
- Re: Anyone using the Pacific-Imag... Gerald Cermak
- Re: Anyone using the Pacific-Image Prime-Film... Chris Brogden
- Re: Anyone using the Pacific-Image Prime-Film... JeffW.
- Re: Anyone using the Pacific-Image Prime-Film... Paul Jones
- Re: Anyone using the Pacific-Image Prime-... Leon Altoff
- Re: Anyone using the Pacific-Image Prime-Film... aimcompute
- Re: Anyone using the Pacific-Image Prime-Film... aimcompute
- Re: Anyone using the Pacific-Image Prime-Film... aimcompute
- Re: Anyone using the Pacific-Image Prime-... Gerald Cermak

