I am not sure about other MZ/ZX bodies, but the MZ-M has very very little
mirror vibration compared to any other Pentax SLRs that I have used. With a
sturdy tripod and a good quality tripod head, I do not see the mirror
vibration could cause any practical difference (and the quality of the
tripod setup is really really critical based on my experience). Maybe the
MLU is not as important as it used to be. Just a thought.
regards,
Alan Chan
> > I can think of several scenarios other than macro or night shots
> > in which MLU would be valuable. True MLU is a valuable feature
> > for any camera, and I use it just about any time I use a
> > tripod.
>
>Me too !! The lack of MLU is giving me cause to reconsider the
>direction I am going to take. It seems the Nikon F5 and Cannon 1v are
>the only current generation AF cameras offering MLU. I think Pentax had
>the opportunity to do something here ...what they have done instead is
>produce a nice "me too" camera in their own style. A nice camera but
>not what I was hoping for.
>
>Mike.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
