On 16 Feb 2001, at 20:03, martin tammer wrote:
> Honestly, There is no reason to go for the high
> faultin' gear. If the table tripod supports your lens
> and is steady and low enough, what's the point,
> outside of ego that you have some really nifty,
> advertising promoted tripod? A sock filled with beans
> will also serve as a low-level support. Just use
> common sense. It all comes down to stability.
> cheers - martin.
Sure a TT tripod like the manfrotto will hold a 67 with 105f2.4 for instance as
long as it is horizontal and it is on a sure surface however it will not hold an
LX + A100f2.8 macro still at full extension even on a flat table-top. My little
Manfrotto goes with me always but it isn't often up to the job.
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
Fax +61-2-9554-9259
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
