> > Not that I have too high expectations, but "semiprofessionel"
> > is a poor choice of words, because it can be interpreted as
> > "not suitable for profesionel" all to easily.
>
>The text also says "professional travel and reportage photography". I
>think this suits very well. The MZ-S is no all purpose pro camera.
>It's a different camera for the ones who want an alternative to
>F5/EOS1 and likes, more like a Leica but with up to date autofocus
>and exposure features. In fact, there are professional areas where
>the MZ-S won't work. Pentax is well aware of this I think. I can
>accept the term semiprofessional without a problem.
The choice of word does not change what the MZ-S is, except maybe the sale
volume.
regards,
Alan Chan
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .