Chris wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Lasse Karlsson wrote:
> > (My suggestion is that we, according to Fred's outline, establish the
> > label OL as in "off list" for these messages.)
>
> I like this! Let's try to do it, okay? "OT" for messages that deal with
> other aspects of photography or photographic equipment than Pentax, and
> "OL" for messages that have nothing to do with photography at all. That
> seems preferable to banning or censoring the messages, especially since
> some of them can be quite interesting. :)
> chris
Well, actually I didn't mean to introduce the OL label for message headers, since OL
by definition would indicate something that belongs off list. I was just thinking of
using the label when in general discussing different types of messages.
On the other hand, if someone does post an OL message to the list I guess it is better
if it gets labeled OL and subsequently is more easily spotted by those who want to
delete it...
Lasse
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
