So it is better to find FA 35/2.0, or old K 35mm I hope Alek Użytkownik Pal Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: >Alek wrote: > > >> And it was M35/2.8 lens for sure? test was done about 15 year ago I think. >> Even better than Zeiss? I asked since many people believe K 35mm lenses are >alegedly much better. > > >I find this a bit weird as I assume (correct me if I'm wrong) the M 35/2.8 is >optically identical to the A 35/2.8, the latter among Pentax weaker efforts (probably >in the league with the A 28/2.8 and A 135/2.8 lenses). According to tests I've seen >the A 35/2 is apparently even worse. > > >Pal > --------------r-e-k-l-a-m-a-----------------
Masz dość płacenia prowizji bankowi ? mBank - załóż konto http://epieniadze.onet.pl/mbank
